We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. Data about your interaction with this site and the ads shown to you may be shared with companies involved in the delivery and/or personalisation of ads on this site and elsewhere online.

Lexus CT 200h vs Mitsubishi Motors Outlander

Lexus CT 200h Electric Car
Lexus CT 200h
Mitsubishi Motors Outlander Electric Car
Mitsubishi Motors Outlander
User rating
7
3.9 out of 5
7 user ratings
5 stars
42 %
4 stars
28 %
3 stars
0 %
2 stars
28 %
1 stars
0 %
5
4.6 out of 5
5 user ratings
5 stars
60 %
4 stars
40 %
3 stars
0 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %

Full Comparison

Engine

Lexus CT 200hLexus CT 200h
Mitsubishi Motors OutlanderMitsubishi Motors Outlander
Engine gearingAutomaticManual
Engine power60.0 kW89.0 kW
Motor rated power0.0 kW0.0 kW

Dimensions

Lexus CT 200hLexus CT 200h
Mitsubishi Motors OutlanderMitsubishi Motors Outlander
Weight1999.59 lb3988.16 lb

Design

Lexus CT 200hLexus CT 200h
Mitsubishi Motors OutlanderMitsubishi Motors Outlander
Number of doors55
Number of seats45
Vehicle classCompact classMiddle class
Vehicle typeSmall carSUV
Production year (generation)2016 2015

Battery

Lexus CT 200hLexus CT 200h
Mitsubishi Motors OutlanderMitsubishi Motors Outlander
Battery power V202.0 V0.0 V
Battery type
Nickel metal hydride
Lithium-ion

Performance

Lexus CT 200hLexus CT 200h
Mitsubishi Motors OutlanderMitsubishi Motors Outlander
Acceleration 0-50 km/h0.0 s0.0 s
Acceleration 0-100 km/h10.0 s11.0 s

Range and charging

Lexus CT 200hLexus CT 200h
Mitsubishi Motors OutlanderMitsubishi Motors Outlander
Battery charging time 0-80%0.0 h0.0 h
Battery charging time 0-100%0.0 h5.0 h

Energy consumption

Lexus CT 200hLexus CT 200h
Mitsubishi Motors OutlanderMitsubishi Motors Outlander
Eco euro class60

Pros & Cons

Pros
      Cons

          Often compared with Lexus CT 200h