We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. Data about your interaction with this site and the ads shown to you may be shared with companies involved in the delivery and/or personalisation of ads on this site and elsewhere online.

Intel Celeron G3900 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600

Intel Celeron G3900 Cpu
Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Cpu
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Editiorial reviews
2
2 editorial reviews
Intel's meteoric rise to dominance in the CPU market over the last two years - and the stunning value of its processors - is highlighted by none better than the Q6600. It's based on the Core microarchitecture, the design responsibleRead more
Read editorial reviews
User rating
36
4.2 out of 5
36 user ratings
5 stars
36 %
4 stars
44 %
3 stars
19 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %
38
4.1 out of 5
38 user ratings
5 stars
36 %
4 stars
39 %
3 stars
21 %
2 stars
2 %
1 stars
0 %

Full Comparison

General

Intel Celeron G3900Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Processor socketLGA 1151LGA 775
Operating modes64-bit64-bit

Processor

Intel Celeron G3900Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Clock speed2.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Number of cores24
Number of threads24
Thermal Design Power (TDP)47.0 W95.0 W
Processor lithography0.0 in0.0 in
Bus typeDMI3FSB
Idle statesyesyes

Memory

Intel Celeron G3900Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Cache2 MB8 MB
Cache typeSmart CacheL2

Features

Intel Celeron G3900Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Thermal monitoring technologiesyesyes
Execute disable bityesyes

Pros & Cons

Pros
      Cons

          Often compared with Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600