We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. Data about your interaction with this site and the ads shown to you may be shared with companies involved in the delivery and/or personalisation of ads on this site and elsewhere online.

Fossil Q Marshal vs Samsung Gear S3 classic

Fossil Q Marshal Smartwatch
Fossil Q Marshal
Samsung Gear S3 classic Smartwatch
Samsung Gear S3 classic
Editiorial reviews
14
2.3 out of 5
5 user ratings
5 stars
0 %
4 stars
40 %
3 stars
0 %
2 stars
40 %
1 stars
0 %
Read editorial reviews
15
3.8 out of 5
7 user ratings
5 stars
28 %
4 stars
57 %
3 stars
14 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %
Read editorial reviews
User rating
52
4.0 out of 5
52 user ratings
5 stars
36 %
4 stars
34 %
3 stars
21 %
2 stars
5 %
1 stars
1 %
38
4.2 out of 5
38 user ratings
5 stars
39 %
4 stars
39 %
3 stars
21 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %

Full Comparison

Features

Fossil Q MarshalFossil Q Marshal
Samsung Gear S3 classicSamsung Gear S3 classic
Heart rate monitoryesyes

Notifications

Fossil Q MarshalFossil Q Marshal
Samsung Gear S3 classicSamsung Gear S3 classic
Notifications
  • Incoming Call
  • Text Message
  • Timer
  • Alarm
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Incoming Call
  • Instagram
  • Missed Call
  • Text Message
  • Timer
  • Twitter
Incoming notification optionsView Icon Only
  • View Content
  • Listen to Content

Dimensions

Fossil Q MarshalFossil Q Marshal
Samsung Gear S3 classicSamsung Gear S3 classic
Case diameter1.81 in1.45 in
Replaceable wrist bandsyesyes
Watch case materialRuggedStainless steel
Wrist band materialLeather
  • Rubber
  • Steel
Water resistanceyesyes
Fully waterproofyesyes

Connectivity

Fossil Q MarshalFossil Q Marshal
Samsung Gear S3 classicSamsung Gear S3 classic
Charging connectionWirelessWireless

Power

Fossil Q MarshalFossil Q Marshal
Samsung Gear S3 classicSamsung Gear S3 classic
Average battery life (standby)24.0 h150.0 h

Pros & Cons

Pros
      Cons

          Often compared with Samsung Gear S3 classic