We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. Data about your interaction with this site and the ads shown to you may be shared with companies involved in the delivery and/or personalisation of ads on this site and elsewhere online.

Fossil Q Grant vs Samsung Gear S3 Frontier

Fossil Q Grant Smartwatch
Fossil Q Grant
Samsung Gear S3 Frontier Smartwatch
Samsung Gear S3 Frontier
Editiorial reviews
8
4.0 out of 5
5 user ratings
5 stars
20 %
4 stars
60 %
3 stars
20 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %
Read editorial reviews
14
3.9 out of 5
6 user ratings
5 stars
33 %
4 stars
50 %
3 stars
16 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %
Read editorial reviews
User rating
25
4.2 out of 5
25 user ratings
5 stars
40 %
4 stars
40 %
3 stars
20 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %
45
4.2 out of 5
45 user ratings
5 stars
35 %
4 stars
51 %
3 stars
13 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %

Full Comparison

Dimensions

Fossil Q GrantFossil Q Grant
Samsung Gear S3 FrontierSamsung Gear S3 Frontier
Case diameter1.73 in1.81 in
Case thickness0.59 in0.51 in
Weight2.4 oz2.19 oz
Watch case materialStainless steel
  • Stainless steel
  • Aluminum
Wrist band material
  • Brown
  • Black
  • Sand
  • Stainless steel
  • Leather
  • Stainless steel
  • Leather
  • Silicone
  • Rubber
Water resistanceyesyes

Platform

Fossil Q GrantFossil Q Grant
Samsung Gear S3 FrontierSamsung Gear S3 Frontier
Operating system
  • Android 4.3+
  • iOS 8+
Tizen OS

Connectivity

Fossil Q GrantFossil Q Grant
Samsung Gear S3 FrontierSamsung Gear S3 Frontier
Bluetoothyesyes
Bluetooth version4.04.2

Power

Fossil Q GrantFossil Q Grant
Samsung Gear S3 FrontierSamsung Gear S3 Frontier
Battery capacity27.0 mAh380.0 mAh

Pros & Cons

Pros
      Cons

          Often compared with Samsung Gear S3 Frontier