We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. Data about your interaction with this site and the ads shown to you may be shared with companies involved in the delivery and/or personalisation of ads on this site and elsewhere online.

Exquisit WM 6910-10 vs Hoover DST10146P

    23.46 in
    33.31 in
    Exquisit WM 6910-10 Washer
    Exquisit WM 6910-10
      23.62 in
      33.46 in
      Hoover DST10146P Washer
      Hoover DST10146P
      Available colors
      User rating
      35
      4.1 out of 5
      35 user ratings
      5 stars
      		40 %
      4 stars
      		31 %
      3 stars
      		25 %
      2 stars
      		2 %
      1 stars
      		0 %
      44
      4.0 out of 5
      44 user ratings
      5 stars
      		27 %
      4 stars
      		40 %
      3 stars
      		31 %
      2 stars
      		0 %
      1 stars
      		0 %

      Full Comparison

      Units:

      Design

      Exquisit WM 6910-10Exquisit WM 6910-10
      Hoover DST10146PHoover DST10146P
      Product designFront loadingFront loading
      Door hingeLeftLeft
      Colour of productWhiteWhite

      Dimensions

      Exquisit WM 6910-10Exquisit WM 6910-10
      Hoover DST10146PHoover DST10146P
      Drum capacity13.23 lb22.05 lb
      Height33.31 in33.46 in
      Weight138.89 lb180.78 lb
      Depth18.7 in25.2 in
      Width23.46 in23.62 in

      Performance

      Exquisit WM 6910-10Exquisit WM 6910-10
      Hoover DST10146PHoover DST10146P
      Spin-drying efficiency classCA

      Technical details

      Exquisit WM 6910-10Exquisit WM 6910-10
      Hoover DST10146PHoover DST10146P
      Maximum spin speed1000.0 rpm1400.0 rpm

      Features

      Exquisit WM 6910-10Exquisit WM 6910-10
      Hoover DST10146PHoover DST10146P
      AquaStop functionyesyes
      Time left displaynoyes

      Energy & Water usage

      Exquisit WM 6910-10Exquisit WM 6910-10
      Hoover DST10146PHoover DST10146P
      Energy consumption per cycle0.95 kWh1.35 kWh
      Water consumption per load12.98 gal16.28 gal

      Pros & Cons

      Pros
          Cons