We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. Data about your interaction with this site and the ads shown to you may be shared with companies involved in the delivery and/or personalisation of ads on this site and elsewhere online.

Cisco MX64-HW vs SonicWALL NSA 3500

9.41 in
0.98 in
Cisco MX64-HW Firewall
Cisco MX64-HW
17.0 in
1.75 in
SonicWALL NSA 3500 Firewall
SonicWALL NSA 3500
Editiorial reviews
2
2 editorial reviews
Offering a big boost in security features and performance, Dell SonicWALL NAS 2600 remains affordable for SMBs.Read more
SonicWall claims their NSA2400 UTM is "next generation security." The Test Center tests the claim.Read more
Read editorial reviews
User rating
1
4.0 out of 5
1 user ratings
5 stars
0 %
4 stars
100 %
3 stars
0 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %
36
4.2 out of 5
36 user ratings
5 stars
44 %
4 stars
33 %
3 stars
19 %
2 stars
2 %
1 stars
0 %

Full Comparison

General

Cisco MX64-HWCisco MX64-HW
SonicWALL NSA 3500SonicWALL NSA 3500
Throughput200.0 Mbps1500.0 Mbps

Dimensions

Cisco MX64-HWCisco MX64-HW
SonicWALL NSA 3500SonicWALL NSA 3500
Width9.41 in17.0 in
Height0.98 in1.75 in
Depth5.2 in13.25 in
Weight49.38 oz181.31 oz

Connectivity

Cisco MX64-HWCisco MX64-HW
SonicWALL NSA 3500SonicWALL NSA 3500
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports56
USB 2.0 ports quantity12

Network

Cisco MX64-HWCisco MX64-HW
SonicWALL NSA 3500SonicWALL NSA 3500
VPN throughput70.0 Mbps625.0 Mbps
Total data transfer rate1000.0 Mbps1500.0 Mbps

Power

Cisco MX64-HWCisco MX64-HW
SonicWALL NSA 3500SonicWALL NSA 3500
Power consumption (typical)4.0 W64.0 W
Power supply18.0 W180.0 W
Operating temperature0 - 405 - 40

Pros & Cons

Pros
      Cons