We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. Data about your interaction with this site and the ads shown to you may be shared with companies involved in the delivery and/or personalisation of ads on this site and elsewhere online.

Cisco C1111-8PLTEEAWE vs Netgear R6400

12.72 in
1.73 in
Cisco C1111-8PLTEEAWE Router
Cisco C1111-8PLTEEAWE
7.81 in
2.56 in
Netgear R6400 Router
Netgear R6400
Editiorial reviews
3
3.9 out of 5
3 user ratings
5 stars
0 %
4 stars
66 %
3 stars
33 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %
Read editorial reviews
User rating
1
4.0 out of 5
1 user ratings
5 stars
0 %
4 stars
100 %
3 stars
0 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %
54
3.9 out of 5
54 user ratings
5 stars
35 %
4 stars
37 %
3 stars
20 %
2 stars
1 %
1 stars
5 %

Full Comparison

Connectivity

Cisco C1111-8PLTEEAWECisco C1111-8PLTEEAWE
Netgear R6400Netgear R6400
Connectivity technology
  • Wireless
  • Wired
  • Wireless
  • Wired

Dimensions

Cisco C1111-8PLTEEAWECisco C1111-8PLTEEAWE
Netgear R6400Netgear R6400
Width12.72 in7.81 in
Height1.73 in2.56 in
Depth9.61 in7.52 in

Communication

Cisco C1111-8PLTEEAWECisco C1111-8PLTEEAWE
Netgear R6400Netgear R6400
Frequency band
  • 2.4 GHz
  • 5 GHz
  • 2.4 GHz
  • 5 GHz

Security

Cisco C1111-8PLTEEAWECisco C1111-8PLTEEAWE
Netgear R6400Netgear R6400
Encryption Algorithm
  • DES
  • Triple DES
  • SHA
  • MD5
  • IKE
  • ECDSA
  • 128-bit AES
  • 256-bit AES
  • 1024-bit RSA
  • 2048-bit RSA
  • 256-bit SHA
  • 512-bit SHA
  • 748-bit RSA
  • 384-bit SHA
  • WPA
  • WPA2
  • WPA2-PSK

Pros & Cons

Pros
      Cons

          Often compared with Netgear R6400