We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. Data about your interaction with this site and the ads shown to you may be shared with companies involved in the delivery and/or personalisation of ads on this site and elsewhere online.

Fossil Q Wander vs LG Watch Style

    Fossil Q Wander Smartwatch
    Fossil Q Wander
      LG Watch Style Smartwatch
      LG Watch Style
      Editiorial reviews
      8
      1.7 out of 5
      3 user ratings
      5 stars
      		0 %
      4 stars
      		0 %
      3 stars
      		33 %
      2 stars
      		33 %
      1 stars
      		0 %
      Read editorial reviews
      13
      3.3 out of 5
      9 user ratings
      5 stars
      		0 %
      4 stars
      		55 %
      3 stars
      		33 %
      2 stars
      		11 %
      1 stars
      		0 %
      Read editorial reviews
      User rating
      33
      4.0 out of 5
      33 user ratings
      5 stars
      		33 %
      4 stars
      		39 %
      3 stars
      		21 %
      2 stars
      		6 %
      1 stars
      		0 %
      39
      4.2 out of 5
      39 user ratings
      5 stars
      		35 %
      4 stars
      		48 %
      3 stars
      		12 %
      2 stars
      		2 %
      1 stars
      		0 %

      Full Comparison

      Units:

      Hardware

      Fossil Q WanderFossil Q Wander
      LG Watch StyleLG Watch Style
      RAM Memory128.0 mB512.0 mB

      Dimensions

      Fossil Q WanderFossil Q Wander
      LG Watch StyleLG Watch Style
      Case diameter1.73 in1.67 in
      Watch case materialMetalStainless steel
      Wrist band materialLeatherLeather

      Platform

      Fossil Q WanderFossil Q Wander
      LG Watch StyleLG Watch Style
      Operating system
      • Android 4.4+
      • iOS 8+
      		Android Wear 2.0

      Pros & Cons

      Pros
          Cons

              Often compared with LG Watch Style

              LG Watch Style Smartwatch
              Elegiant Sport
              LGWatch Style
              ElegiantSport