We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. Data about your interaction with this site and the ads shown to you may be shared with companies involved in the delivery and/or personalisation of ads on this site and elsewhere online.

JBL Charge 3 vs Monster SuperStar S300

8.39 in
3.48 in
JBL Charge 3 Wireless Speaker
JBL Charge 3
11.0 in
4.75 in
Monster SuperStar S300 Wireless Speaker
Monster SuperStar S300
Available colors
Editiorial reviews
44
3.9 out of 5
23 user ratings
5 stars
26 %
4 stars
60 %
3 stars
13 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %
Read editorial reviews
1
1 editorial reviews
Monster's answer to the Mini Jambox is billed as the world's smallest audiophile Bluetooth speaker.Read more
Read editorial reviews
User rating
80
3.9 out of 5
80 user ratings
5 stars
42 %
4 stars
20 %
3 stars
22 %
2 stars
11 %
1 stars
3 %
42
4.2 out of 5
42 user ratings
5 stars
42 %
4 stars
38 %
3 stars
14 %
2 stars
4 %
1 stars
0 %

Full Comparison

Sound

JBL Charge 3JBL Charge 3
Monster SuperStar S300Monster SuperStar S300
Number of drivers22

Design

JBL Charge 3JBL Charge 3
Monster SuperStar S300Monster SuperStar S300
Colour of product
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Blue,Red
  • Green
  • Grey
  • Red
  • Turquoise
Black

Dimensions

JBL Charge 3JBL Charge 3
Monster SuperStar S300Monster SuperStar S300
Height3.48 in4.75 in
Width8.39 in11.0 in
Depth3.43 in5.25 in

Connectivity

JBL Charge 3JBL Charge 3
Monster SuperStar S300Monster SuperStar S300
USByesyes
AUX inyesyes
Bluetoothyesyes
Wireless network (Wi-Fi)nono

Features

JBL Charge 3JBL Charge 3
Monster SuperStar S300Monster SuperStar S300
IP code (level of dust/water resistance)IPX7IPX7

Power

JBL Charge 3JBL Charge 3
Monster SuperStar S300Monster SuperStar S300
USB poweredyesyes
Battery life (max)12.0 h15.0 h

Pros & Cons

Pros
      Cons

          Often compared with JBL Charge 3