We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. Data about your interaction with this site and the ads shown to you may be shared with companies involved in the delivery and/or personalisation of ads on this site and elsewhere online.

HyperX QuadCast vs Rode NT-USB

HyperX QuadCast Microphone
HyperX QuadCast
Rode NT-USB Microphone
Rode NT-USB
Available colors
Editiorial reviews
13
3.5 out of 5
6 user ratings
5 stars
16 %
4 stars
66 %
3 stars
0 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %
Read editorial reviews
8
8 editorial reviews
Focused, clear, and user-friendly.Read more
A studio quality condenser with USB?Read more
USB mics are becoming increasingly common and affordable, but the quality varies. The Rode brand name, though, is one which...Read more
Read editorial reviews
User rating
89
3.8 out of 5
89 user ratings
5 stars
35 %
4 stars
25 %
3 stars
24 %
2 stars
8 %
1 stars
4 %
79
3.9 out of 5
79 user ratings
5 stars
35 %
4 stars
30 %
3 stars
25 %
2 stars
5 %
1 stars
3 %

Full Comparison

Technical details

HyperX QuadCastHyperX QuadCast
Rode NT-USBRode NT-USB
Microphone typeTable microphoneStudio microphone

Recording quality

HyperX QuadCastHyperX QuadCast
Rode NT-USBRode NT-USB
Bit rate16.0 bit16.0 bit
Frequency range20 - 2000020 - 20000

Design

HyperX QuadCastHyperX QuadCast
Rode NT-USBRode NT-USB
Colour of productBlack,RedBlack

Dimensions

HyperX QuadCastHyperX QuadCast
Rode NT-USBRode NT-USB
Weight8.96 oz18.34 oz

Connectivity

HyperX QuadCastHyperX QuadCast
Rode NT-USBRode NT-USB
Device interfaceUSBUSB
Connectivity technologyWiredWired

Pros & Cons

Pros
      Cons

          Often compared with HyperX QuadCast

          Often compared with Rode NT-USB