We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. Data about your interaction with this site and the ads shown to you may be shared with companies involved in the delivery and/or personalisation of ads on this site and elsewhere online.

Fossil Q Marshal vs Samsung Gear S3 Frontier

Fossil Q Marshal Smartwatch
Fossil Q Marshal
Samsung Gear S3 Frontier Smartwatch
Samsung Gear S3 Frontier
Editiorial reviews
14
2.3 out of 5
5 user ratings
5 stars
0 %
4 stars
40 %
3 stars
0 %
2 stars
40 %
1 stars
0 %
Read editorial reviews
14
3.9 out of 5
6 user ratings
5 stars
33 %
4 stars
50 %
3 stars
16 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %
Read editorial reviews
User rating
52
4.0 out of 5
52 user ratings
5 stars
36 %
4 stars
34 %
3 stars
21 %
2 stars
5 %
1 stars
1 %
45
4.2 out of 5
45 user ratings
5 stars
35 %
4 stars
51 %
3 stars
13 %
2 stars
0 %
1 stars
0 %

Full Comparison

Features

Fossil Q MarshalFossil Q Marshal
Samsung Gear S3 FrontierSamsung Gear S3 Frontier
Heart rate monitoryesyes

Dimensions

Fossil Q MarshalFossil Q Marshal
Samsung Gear S3 FrontierSamsung Gear S3 Frontier
Case diameter1.81 in1.81 in
Watch case materialRugged
  • Stainless steel
  • Aluminum
Wrist band materialLeather
  • Leather
  • Silicone
  • Rubber
Water resistanceyesyes
Fully waterproofyesno

Power

Fossil Q MarshalFossil Q Marshal
Samsung Gear S3 FrontierSamsung Gear S3 Frontier
Average battery life (standby)24.0 h96.0 h

Pros & Cons

Pros
      Cons

          Often compared with Samsung Gear S3 Frontier