Schwach | Durchschnitt | Gut | Exzellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Spitzenleistung | 80 W Am besten: Devialet Phantom Spitzenleistung: 4500 W | |||
Gewicht | 4749,11 g Am besten: Philips BT2650 Gewicht: 0,21 g |
Niederfrequenz | 50.0 Hz |
---|---|
Hochfrequenz | 20.0 kHz |
Spitzenleistung | 80.0 W |
Höhe | 184.91 mm |
---|---|
Breite | 350.01 mm |
Tiefe | 184.91 mm |
Gewicht | 4749.11 g |
Dockingstation für Handy / Tablet | Nein |
---|---|
Funkempfänger | Nein |
Art des Radios |
|
Smart Speaker (virtueller Assistent) | Nein |
Streaming-Standards |
|
Farbe des Produkts |
|
---|
USB | Nein |
---|---|
Andere Anschlüsse | Cinch-Stereo-Eingang |
Verbindungsquelle |
|
Bluetooth | Ja |
Kabelgebundene Eingänge |
|
Bluetooth-Version | 4.2 |
Analoger 3,5-mm-Eingang (Aux) | 1 |
Drahtloses Netzwerk (Wi-Fi) | Ja |
Batteriebetrieben | Nein |
---|---|
Elektrisch (nicht USB) | Ja |
An iconically designed, and very loud, multi-room speaker
The sound quality is fairly good overall, especially with rock music, but I had several problems with its operation.
The Marshall Stanmore multi-room speaker wants to be your go-to option for home audio. But how does it sound? And is it worth the $450 asking price?
AppleInsider checks out Marshall's Stanmore and Action multi-room speakers to test out if they are solid options for the wireless speaker fan, even if they only support only the original AirPlay.
The Marshall Stanmore II is a good all-around performer, matching or surpassing the scores of much more expensive wireless speakers in our rankings.
Until now, if you wanted a smart speaker that didn’t make a dog’s dinner of playing your Spotify Discover Weekly playlist, the Sonos One was the obvious pur...
Marshall's Stanmore II Voice smart speaker improves upon the already-solid audio of the Stanmore II Bluetooth while adding your choice of Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant voice control to the mix.